Note: This book also tackles broader, related topics.
Summary
The contemporary pro-life movement seeks to end abortion by means of an inherent violation of the non-aggression principle. This creates a scenario in which abortion thrives. Therefore, the a non-violent (anti-violence), non-aggression movement must take its place if decriminalized abortion is to "end." The right to life is best secured by a stateless, voluntary government, based on rational self-government of the individual. State-type systems always serve to increase both death and murder rates, and to defeat murder a super-strategy of complete rationality-based sacrificial integrity must be adopted. All else is unrealistic, irrational, and pro-death. (with the most comparable strategies being less effective)
*All the above statements will be fully and comprehensively proven using sound reasoning, etc. methodology outlined in the Logic-Reasoning-Science book.
Outline
Sections:
Intro: "I'm too offended to read this. And I'm too busy besides."
3 questions: What is it? What's going on? What to do about it?
-Embryology
-SLED
-Morality and strategy.
A brief into to moral philosophy.
-The necessary comprehensive rationality foundation.
-Natural law and "natural rights." (+ the is-ought false dichotomy... and the pro-life implication of the solution!!!)
-The non-aggression principle.
Social movements: bringing justice to a larger scale?
-Breakdown: Pro-choice rhetoric, Pro-abortion, Pro-life
--*Comparing and contrasting.
-"I totally stopped reading this book-- how could the pro-life movement actually be as pro-abortion as pro-choice movement?" A brief introduction to the Hegelian dialectic in practice: proof that both pro-life and pro-choice movements are the allies (or pawns) of the continued growth of abortion, euthanasia, ESCR, etc. in a state-run context. (the state is violence/chaos/a death cult/pro-death)
Comparative (mostly U.S.) history of the pro-life movement, highlighting pro-life strategies, their implementation and effect, contrasting "pro-choice" strategy and their effects (esp. on abortion):
-Pre-1967
-1967-->1986 Eugenics-->abortion
-1986-->1994 The Life and Times of Operation Rescue
-1994-->2009 (or whenever year I publish final draft-- present day) The contemporary debate.
*My personal observations/research. (go into the implications of what I found in a later section)
The missing history:
*Coercive monopoly extortion rackets, libertinism, and human nature.
-Indirectness: how we slaves forge our own bonds, and keep one another in bondage, and from "running off the plantation."
Aside: movement counter-movement dynamics.
-The dominant movement and the "sect": how the diaprax destroys true justice in *every social movement*.
-The fallout: defeatism, willful ignorance, busied ignorance, complacent distractedness, ambivalence to action, exaggerated false victories, and the continuing silent occupation.
Putting it all together:
-Work justice, rather than asking others to.
-The truth about "the culture war": 1) not a war at all, but a silent occupation. 2) Divide and conquer. 3) Social and global "interdependence," or how the tentacles of the octopus invade every orifice. 4) Corporatism's role: big business, small business, non-profits, ("being in bed" with the state vs. "making out behind the gym"), and the necessary alliance of libertinism and the state.
-Why "pro-life" is pro-choice is pro-abortion, and how the pro-life movement cannot succeed as is.
-How a child is not an adult: "pro-life" is the child, "non-aggression" is the adult.
--Why an injustice system cannot be turned to justice; why an anti-government can never become just government.
--The inherent deliberate ignorance involved in all 3 positions, and the solution: comprehensive rationality and Outcome Thinking.
-The real war: libertarianism vs. libertinism. (cf. Treatise on Non-Aggression and the ideological state)
*The cost of opportunity (opportunity cost and "combining strategies"); the narrow path of applying principles.
Suggested strategy: real war, fighting death with life.
-AnCap libertarianism, and the comprehensive foundational human rights pro-justice anti-movement. (anti-statism/market anarchism)
-"Isn't that too extreme?" Moral integrity in the land of complacency. // The practicality of philosophy // The irrationality of compromise.
Appendix: FAQ
-->The point of the FAQ is to handle *every possible objection* to all the points I make in the book. (mainly, so I don't have to make this book # times longer, and can stick all the questions into a conveniently organized (like RA's PYA book!) segment, so when people have a Q, they can skip to this page (keep it open in another tab while you read!), referring to it whenever they have a specific objection.
-Maybe eventually I can list "see FAQ # 43, 56, and 72 for common objections," at certain points in the book or even skipping all that, and merely listing a number (like wikipedia for citations) that links directly to the FAQ, describing in the FWD/Intro which are citations, which are FAQ links, and why I chose that format. (I think it is simpler just to say all that in the intro, and then just list a set apart number in the text, so that I don't have to write any words; it will all be known if they read the intro-- Just state at the beginning of the intro that this book is formatted a bit differently, and so therefore this intro is necessary.
Ⓐ Gabriel Koulikov
Summary
The contemporary pro-life movement seeks to end abortion by means of an inherent violation of the non-aggression principle. This creates a scenario in which abortion thrives. Therefore, the a non-violent (anti-violence), non-aggression movement must take its place if decriminalized abortion is to "end." The right to life is best secured by a stateless, voluntary government, based on rational self-government of the individual. State-type systems always serve to increase both death and murder rates, and to defeat murder a super-strategy of complete rationality-based sacrificial integrity must be adopted. All else is unrealistic, irrational, and pro-death. (with the most comparable strategies being less effective)
*All the above statements will be fully and comprehensively proven using sound reasoning, etc. methodology outlined in the Logic-Reasoning-Science book.
Outline
Sections:
Intro: "I'm too offended to read this. And I'm too busy besides."
3 questions: What is it? What's going on? What to do about it?
-Embryology
-SLED
-Morality and strategy.
A brief into to moral philosophy.
-The necessary comprehensive rationality foundation.
-Natural law and "natural rights." (+ the is-ought false dichotomy... and the pro-life implication of the solution!!!)
-The non-aggression principle.
Social movements: bringing justice to a larger scale?
-Breakdown: Pro-choice rhetoric, Pro-abortion, Pro-life
--*Comparing and contrasting.
-"I totally stopped reading this book-- how could the pro-life movement actually be as pro-abortion as pro-choice movement?" A brief introduction to the Hegelian dialectic in practice: proof that both pro-life and pro-choice movements are the allies (or pawns) of the continued growth of abortion, euthanasia, ESCR, etc. in a state-run context. (the state is violence/chaos/a death cult/pro-death)
Comparative (mostly U.S.) history of the pro-life movement, highlighting pro-life strategies, their implementation and effect, contrasting "pro-choice" strategy and their effects (esp. on abortion):
-Pre-1967
-1967-->1986 Eugenics-->abortion
-1986-->1994 The Life and Times of Operation Rescue
-1994-->2009 (or whenever year I publish final draft-- present day) The contemporary debate.
*My personal observations/research. (go into the implications of what I found in a later section)
The missing history:
*Coercive monopoly extortion rackets, libertinism, and human nature.
-Indirectness: how we slaves forge our own bonds, and keep one another in bondage, and from "running off the plantation."
Aside: movement counter-movement dynamics.
-The dominant movement and the "sect": how the diaprax destroys true justice in *every social movement*.
-The fallout: defeatism, willful ignorance, busied ignorance, complacent distractedness, ambivalence to action, exaggerated false victories, and the continuing silent occupation.
Putting it all together:
-Work justice, rather than asking others to.
-The truth about "the culture war": 1) not a war at all, but a silent occupation. 2) Divide and conquer. 3) Social and global "interdependence," or how the tentacles of the octopus invade every orifice. 4) Corporatism's role: big business, small business, non-profits, ("being in bed" with the state vs. "making out behind the gym"), and the necessary alliance of libertinism and the state.
-Why "pro-life" is pro-choice is pro-abortion, and how the pro-life movement cannot succeed as is.
-How a child is not an adult: "pro-life" is the child, "non-aggression" is the adult.
--Why an injustice system cannot be turned to justice; why an anti-government can never become just government.
--The inherent deliberate ignorance involved in all 3 positions, and the solution: comprehensive rationality and Outcome Thinking.
-The real war: libertarianism vs. libertinism. (cf. Treatise on Non-Aggression and the ideological state)
*The cost of opportunity (opportunity cost and "combining strategies"); the narrow path of applying principles.
Suggested strategy: real war, fighting death with life.
-AnCap libertarianism, and the comprehensive foundational human rights pro-justice anti-movement. (anti-statism/market anarchism)
-"Isn't that too extreme?" Moral integrity in the land of complacency. // The practicality of philosophy // The irrationality of compromise.
Appendix: FAQ
-->The point of the FAQ is to handle *every possible objection* to all the points I make in the book. (mainly, so I don't have to make this book # times longer, and can stick all the questions into a conveniently organized (like RA's PYA book!) segment, so when people have a Q, they can skip to this page (keep it open in another tab while you read!), referring to it whenever they have a specific objection.
-Maybe eventually I can list "see FAQ # 43, 56, and 72 for common objections," at certain points in the book or even skipping all that, and merely listing a number (like wikipedia for citations) that links directly to the FAQ, describing in the FWD/Intro which are citations, which are FAQ links, and why I chose that format. (I think it is simpler just to say all that in the intro, and then just list a set apart number in the text, so that I don't have to write any words; it will all be known if they read the intro-- Just state at the beginning of the intro that this book is formatted a bit differently, and so therefore this intro is necessary.
Ⓐ Gabriel Koulikov
Leave a comment
